Evolving Nuclear Deterrence Strategies: Balancing Security and Stability in a Changing World Order.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/ygzbet12Keywords:
Nuclear Deterrence, Stability, Multipolarity, Balance of Power and SecurityAbstract
In an increasing evolving global landscape, nuclear deterrence strategies face an unprecedented challenge as the global order transcends from bipolar to a multipolar dimension. This paper analyses the ramifications of preserving stability and security in a world dominated by diverse power centers, technological innovations and emerging global threats. It examines the practical and theoretical implications of nuclear deterrence in a polycentric context including the risk of escalation, miscalculation and proliferation. By examining the historical trends, current mechanisms and potential future events which increases the likelihood of a nuclear disaster. This research paper provides a critical perspective on how states can adapt deterrence strategies to their national needs by enhancing global stability. It adopts theoretical framework such as balance of power, power transition and threat theories to demonstrate how deterrence strategies can be optimized. This paper highlights the importance of robust communication channels, reinforcing nuclear control agreements, collaborative security policies to mitigate risks and fostering a sustainable equilibrium in the realm of nuclear affairs.
References
References
Freedman, L. (2003). The evolution of nuclear strategy (3rd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Kroenig, M. (2015). The Logic of American Nuclear Strategy: Why Strategic Superiority Matters.
Nye, J. S. (2020). Do Morals Matter? Presidents and Foreign Policy from FDR to Trump.
Sagan, S. D. (2020). "The Limits of Safety in Modern Nuclear Deterrence." International Security
Cirincione, J. (2013). Nuclear weapons: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Kroenig, M. (2016). Extended deterrence in the 21st century. Oxford University Press.
Lieber, K. L., & Press, D. (2016). *The end of MAD? International Security, 40(4), 7-44.
Payne, K. (2018). Missile defense: A very short introduction*. Oxford University Press.
Sagan, S. D. (2019). The limits of nuclear deterrence. In The Oxford Handbook of Nuclear Strategy
(pp. 3-22). Oxford University Press
Waltz, K. N. (2016). Nuclear weapons and the future of international politics. In The Oxford
Handbook of Nuclear Strategy (pp. 23-38). Oxford University Press.
Holloway, D. (1994). Stalin and the bomb: The Soviet Union and atomic energy, 1939-1956. Yale
University Press
Sagan, S. D. (1987). Why do states build nuclear weapons? Three models in search of a
bomb. International Security, 21(3), 54-86
Kang, K., & Kugler, J. (2023). Beyond deterrence: Uncertain stability in the nuclear era. Conflict
Management and Peace Science, 40(6), 655–674
Kang, K., & Kugler, J. (2023). Averting Nuclear War. Springer.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Chick Edmond
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
